🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an cute small “sweetheart”. Orion – nicknamed “Onion Ring” – is a big but fiercely protective friend. Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and sways like a wiggly creature. Lillooet the beluga is the “most affectionate” with a heart of gold.

A group of thirty captive marine mammals in a Canada-based amusement park have been entangled in a tussle between a closed attraction, local and national governments and advocacy groups.

But those most familiar with the whales say the intense controversy over their future often fails to consider the individual traits of the whales who, after growing up in enclosed habitats, have been carefully observed by the caretakers who see them each day.

After the federal government disallowed the transfer of the belugas to China, the embattled attraction near the famous falls where they are housed threatened to euthanize them unless the federal government pays for the cost of keeping them alive. Canada’s marine resources official has denied that request, placing the 30 whales in an ever more uncertain circumstance.

Highly Cognitive Marine Mammals

Scientists say that belugas’ neural makeup, along with their sound replication, problem solving and group interactions point to they are deeply intelligent animals – something Kristy Burgess observed personally.

Burgess spent three years as a beluga trainer, a position that involved earning the trust of the sea creatures.

“Building up those bonds over time takes a lot of dedication and a lot of love. At the beginning, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “In time, you gain mutual trust. And they start being more trusting with you. It’s just so magical and rewarding.”

Burgess knew the whales were highly intelligent, but she says she was even so surprised by the subtleties and unique traits in their personalities. She cultivated a particular love for a pair of whales with opposing natures.

“Eve selected me. Cleo demanded work,” she said. “They altered the way I perceive relationships.”

Growing Opposition and Deteriorating Conditions

Burgess’s relationship with the whales progressed against a backdrop of growing public opposition to their enclosure.

During her tenure at the attraction, seven belugas and the park’s one killer whale, the orca, died. In total, 19 belugas have died at the park since recent years, a toll which the facility links to natural mortality, but which activists say points to the substandard environment in which they were kept.

The park did not open to the public over the summer, but Burgess says she saw with her own eyes consequences of the shutdown. “Concrete is falling apart from the enclosures because they’re falling apart and not being fixed. The whales are curious and so they pick it up and move about with pieces in their jaws. It’s distressing to see.”

The park did not reply to a inquiry, but in the past asserted: “The whales … obtain far superior medical attention and constant attention than any human in the United Kingdom, or elsewhere.”

Fate in Limbo and Proposed Solutions

The former employee was fired from the facility in early March following the demise of a beluga, an ailing beluga the caretakers had to humanely kill. She said the park thought details of the incident were leaked to the press and she was released shortly thereafter.

The ambiguity over the whales’ future has left her and other caretakers in anguish. She says the park’s warning to kill its whales is a bargaining chip and is a “logistically impossible” task, adding any attempts to put down even a one beluga would require “immense manpower”, equipment and machinery.

“It’s impossible in hell the staff would ever do it,” she said.

Burgess backs requests for the whales to be removed right away from the park, with its deteriorating pools and reduced personnel.

In the autumn, the nation’s government official rejected a proposal to send the whales to China.

“Allowing the request would have meant a ongoing situation in confinement and a reversion to public entertainment,” the official wrote. “As Canadians, we know that marine mammals belong in the ocean, not in enclosures for our amusement. I could not in clear conscience permit an export that would prolong the conditions these belugas have endured.”

But the former trainer said the official’s comments indicate a more general incorrect perception of the facts of life for belugas born in captivity.

“The people needs to realize these are whales that have lived entirely in captivity and they will need human care for the foreseeable future,” she said. “Many just don’t comprehend that it’s not as easy as saying ‘shut it down’.”

Alternative Habitat and Ongoing Debate

As officials struggle to find a answer, proposals have emerged, some of which have questionable practicality. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be released into the open waters of northern regions – where whales are a primary resource of food for Indigenous peoples.

A proposed refuge in the region of eastern Canada, which has received regulatory clearance, has shown to be highly debated. The planned facility, which includes a large area of protected cove, doesn’t yet exist. Supporters remain optimistic that it could in time represent a permanent resolution for a number of the whales.

But, Burgess says, among caretakers she’s spoken with, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “simply an experiment” in the whales’ future.

Different voices say the possibility of a protected habitat reflects a broader global shift away from captive facilities and could represent a feasible approach in the coming months.

Charles Vinick, director of the sanctuary project, said the location will simulate the mental engagement and feeding regimen the whales obtain from specialists, albeit in a significantly bigger space. He said after the medical condition of whales is thoroughly evaluated, which could take months|an extended period|